Perfume review: Angham Second Song

Lattafa Angham Second Song Review

This post contains affiliate links. I earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Good Gourmand. Wrong Price. Wrong Name.

I broke my own rule for this one. I usually wait at least six months before buying a new launch — long enough for the hype to settle and the honest reviews to surface. I didn’t wait this time, because I love the original Angham enough to keep a backup bottle, and the name alone was enough to make me move quickly.

That context matters — because the disappointment that followed wasn’t just about the fragrance. It was about what the name implied and what the bottle failed to deliver. This Lattafa Angham Second Song review is the honest account of both.


Executive Summary

Angham Second Song opens gourmand-forward — praline and vanilla leading immediately, warm and cozy rather than bright or floral. It develops smoothly and wears comfortably, but it never opens up into anything unexpected. The florals in the heart stay quiet, the sweetness stays consistent, and the overall effect is pleasant but linear — closer in character to a Nebras-style comfort vanilla than anything that earns the Angham name. Longevity is the other problem: four hours on skin is noticeably shorter than what the original delivers and what the price point should guarantee.

Key Takeaway: Angham Second Song is a good fragrance at the wrong price. At $50 it’s being sold on the reputation of its predecessor rather than the merit of what’s in the bottle — and for anyone buying it because they love the original, that’s a mismatch worth knowing about before you spend anything.


The Notes

Top: Pear Blossom, Bergamot Heart: Peony, Praline, Orange Blossom Base: Vanilla, Ambroxan, Tonka Bean, Musk

Price: $49.99

(Full breakdown on Fragrantica )

The note list promises brightness at the top, florals in the heart, and a warm vanilla base. On skin the brightness and florals are largely theoretical — the praline and vanilla arrive first and stay loudest throughout. What’s listed at the top and heart matters less than what actually shows up, and what actually shows up is a gourmand. (Shop Lattafa Angham Second Song on Amazon)


First Impressions: Warm, Sweet, and Immediately Familiar

The opening is gourmand-forward from the first spray — praline and vanilla arriving together, warm and cozy and immediately recognizable to anyone who already wears affordable Middle Eastern vanillas. It smells good. It smells safe. It smells like a fragrance that knows its audience and plays directly to them.

What it doesn’t smell like is Angham.

That’s the observation that colors everything that follows. The original Angham has a lavender-supported structure in the opening that gives it shape and restraint — the quality that puts it in the refined evening vanilla lane rather than the comfort gourmand lane. Second Song skips that structure entirely. The opening is warmer, softer, and more immediately sweet — closer in character to Lattafa Nebras than to the fragrance whose name it carries. Not a bad thing on its own. A significant thing when the name and the price are both trading on a different expectation.


Development: One Lane, Start to Finish

As Second Song settles, the praline and vanilla soften into a creamy sweetness that stays consistent throughout the wear. The ambroxan and musk provide structure underneath without contributing much projection, and the florals — peony and orange blossom — sit quietly beneath the sweetness without doing the lifting or brightening work the heart notes should be doing.

The result is linear in a way that works against it at this price point. Linearity in a comfort vanilla at $15 is fine — that’s the category expectation. Linearity in a $50 fragrance with the Angham name attached to it is harder to defend. The original earns its complexity through the tension between the lavender opening and the vanilla dry-down. Second Song resolves that tension before it starts by eliminating the lavender entirely, and what’s left is pleasant but flat — a fragrance that arrives where it’s going immediately and stays there.


Performance: The Part That’s Hardest to Ignore

  • Projection: Moderate early, fading relatively quickly
  • Longevity: 4 hours on skin — noticeably shorter than the original
  • Clothing: Better than skin, but not dramatically so
  • Restraint note: 4–5 sprays maximum — overspraying doesn’t extend the wear, it just makes the sweetness heavier in the opening

Four hours is the number that makes the value case collapse. The original Angham lasts significantly longer on skin and considerably longer on clothing. Second Song doesn’t match either metric — which at $50 isn’t just a performance limitation, it’s a pricing problem. The longevity alone would make this a difficult recommendation against the original at roughly half the price.


Does It Earn Wardrobe Space?

  • Role it fills: Casual comfort gourmand — warm, sweet, and cozy for low-stakes daily wear and at-home rotation
  • Gap it fills: The role the original Angham doesn’t fill — an uncomplicated, immediately sweet vanilla for buyers who find the original’s structure too nuanced for casual wear
  • Duplication risk: High against Nebras and similar creamy comfort vanillas at lower price points. Moderate against the original Angham — they occupy different lanes despite sharing a name, which means the duplication risk depends entirely on which lane your wardrobe is filling.

The honest wardrobe case for Second Song is narrow. It fills the casual comfort gourmand slot competently — but that slot is already well-covered in the affordable space by fragrances that cost significantly less and perform as well or better. The only scenario where Second Song earns its price is if you specifically want something slightly softer and less structured than Nebras Elixir and are willing to pay a premium for the Lattafa branding.

That’s a thin justification for $50.


Who Should Buy Angham Second Song

  • Gourmand lovers who prefer soft, cozy, dessert-leaning vanillas and aren’t comparing to the original
  • Buyers who enjoy Nebras-style profiles and want something slightly lighter and less intense
  • Those who prioritize immediate comfort over longevity and complexity

Who Should Skip It

  • Anyone buying this because they love the original Angham — the two fragrances share a name and very little else
  • Buyers who care about longevity at this price point — four hours doesn’t justify $50
  • Those hoping for the refinement, structure, and complexity of the original in a new format
  • Anyone whose comfort vanilla slot is already filled with something performing better at a lower price

Final Verdict

Angham Second Song is a good perfume. The sweetness is well-calibrated, the blend is stable, and it wears comfortably in the contexts it’s suited for. If it were priced at $20 alongside the other affordable comfort vanillas it actually resembles, this would be a straightforward recommendation for the right buyer.

At $50, the price is being carried by the Angham name rather than what’s in the bottle — and that gap between expectation and delivery is what makes this a difficult purchase to justify with clear eyes. The original Lattafa Angham is more complex, lasts longer, and costs less. That comparison exists whether Second Song invites it or not, and it doesn’t win.

Test before you buy. And if you love the original, manage your expectations carefully before letting the name make the decision for you.

Rating: 2.5/5 — Good fragrance, wrong price, wrong name.


Still deciding between Angham and Second Song? The full Angham review maps exactly what the original does and why it earns its wardrobe slot — then visit the vanilla fragrance wardrobe guide to see where either one fits in a structured collection.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *